![]() |
![]() |
Home | Search | Contact Us |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
Key Decisions - December 2008 General Legal Key Decisions - December 2008 [pdf] Welcome to the December 2008 edition of the Key Decisions eNewsletter, Berger Kahn's monthly publication summarizing the most important California state and federal court decisions. Key Decisions is now an online publication only. To join our mailing list, please send us an email at KeyDecisions@BergerKahn.com or click here. In This Issue Aguilar v. Aguilar: An Irrevocable Trust Can Be Irrevocable Even As To One of Its Creators Arriaga v. CitiCapital Commercial Corporation: A Finance Lessor Is Not Liable As One In The Producing And Marketing Enterprise Conte v. Wyeth, Inc.: A Name-Brand Drug Manufacturer Could Be Liable To One Who Uses A Generic Version Even Though The Generic Manufacturer Is Not Liable Dominguez v. Washington Mutual Bank: Interference With A Co-Worker’s Work Could Lead A Trier Of Fact to Find It Was Motivated By The Same Discriminatory Intent As Prior Discriminatory Remarks Glencoe v. Neue Sentimental Film USA: Even If A Plaintiff Dismisses During Trial To Avoid Losing A Motion For Judgment, The Defendant Is Not The Prevailing Party For Purposes Of An Award Of Attorney’s Fees Hecht v. Paul Revere Life Insurance Company: “Total” Disability Depends On The Nature Of Their Work Hoopes v. Dolan: If A Jury Decides Fact Issues, Those Facts Bind The Judge’s Subsequent Equitable Determination Leung v. Verdugo Hills Hospital: An Appeal Bond Is Based On The Lump Sum Present Value Of A Judgment Paiva v. Nichols: An Interim Victory In A Prior Action Precludes Liability For Malicious Prosecution Surrey v. Truebeginnings: A Person Who Decides Against Paying For A Business’s Services or Products Does Not Have Standing To Sue For Discriminatory Practices Back |
|
|
|
||
![]() |
© 2010 Berger Kahn, A Law Corporation Disclaimer |
|