![]() |
![]() |
Home | Search | Contact Us |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
Key Decisions - May 2009 General Legal Key Decisions - May 2009 [pdf] Welcome to the May 2009 edition of the Key Decisions eNewsletter, Berger Kahn's monthly publication summarizing the most important California state and federal court decisions. Key Decisions is now an online publication only. To join our mailing list, please send us an email at KeyDecisions@BergerKahn.com or click here. In This Issue Bruns v. The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.: A Merchant Has No Duty To Verify That A Third-Party Check Was Authorized Cohen v. Brown: An Anti-SLAPP Motion Does Not Protect Conduct That Amounts To Extortion Greenberg v. Superior Court: Psychotherapist Has No Direct Duty To The Victim Of A Patient’s Violence And Has A Statutory Duty Only When The Patient Expresses A Serious Threat Against An Identifiable Victim Mintz v. Blue Cross of California: A Health Insurance Plan Administrator Owes A Member A Duty Of Care In Making Benefits Determinations Phillips v. TLC Plumbing, Inc.: An Employer Was Not Liable For A Former Employee’s Misconduct Sakaguchi v. Sakaguchi: Misspelling A Defendant’s Name Did Not Render A Default Judgment Voidable Silverbrand v. County of Los Angeles: A Prisoner’s Notice Of Appeal In A Civil Action Was Timely Filed Vidrio v. Hernandez: An Insurer Cannot Be Sanctioned For Failing To Negotiate In Good Faith On Behalf Of Its Insured Back |
|
|
|
||
![]() |
© 2012 Berger Kahn, A Law Corporation Disclaimer |
|