![]() |
![]() |
Home | Search | Contact Us |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
Key Decisions - August 2009 General Legal Key Decisions - August 2009 [pdf] Welcome to the August 2009 edition of the Key Decisions eNewsletter, Berger Kahn's monthly publication summarizing the most important California state and federal court decisions. Key Decisions is now an online publication only. To join our mailing list, please send us an email at KeyDecisions@BergerKahn.com or click here. In This Issue Delgado v. Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club of Southern California: The Decision To Purposely Injure a Perceived Assailant Is Not An Accident Fontaine v. Superior Court: Venue Was Proper In The County Of The Plaintiff’s Residence In An Action For Unfair Debt Collection Practices Hughes v. Pair: Not All Boorish And Crude Conduct Will Support Claims For Sexual Harassment Or Intentional Infliction Of Emotional Distress Laabs v. Southern California Edison Company: A Utility Company’s Motion For Summary Judgment Did Not Establish It Owed No Duty Of Care To A Plaintiff Who Crashed Into One Of Its Light Poles Manson, Iver & York v. Black: The Trial Court Properly Set Aside A Default Judgment When it Was Against The Wrong Person Maystruk v. Infinity Insurance Company: An Insurance Policy Provision Under Which The Insurer Need Only Pay 80% Of The Reasonable Repair Cost For Damage To An Automobile Is Valid Superior Dispatch, Inc. v. Insurance Company of New York: An Insurer Could Not Rely On A Policy Provision It Had Not Brought To The Insured’s Attention Venoco, Inc. v. Gulf Underwriters Insurance Company: An Insurance Policy Provision Requiring Notice Of An Occurrence Be Given Within A Specified Time Was Unenforceable Back |
|
|
|
||
![]() |
© 2010 Berger Kahn, A Law Corporation Disclaimer |
|