Home | Search | Contact Us

	Key Decisions - September 2009 General Legal  Key Decisions - September 2009 [pdf] Welcome to the September 2009 edition of the Key Decisions eNewsletter, Berger Kahn's monthly publication summarizing the most important California state and federal court decisions. Key Decisions is now an online publication only. To join our mailing list, please send us an email at KeyDecisions@BergerKahn.com or click here. In This Issue 21st Century Insurance Co. v. Superior Court (Quintana): Attorney Fees Are Disregarded In Determining Whether An Insured Has Been Made Whole And Required To Reimburse Med-Pay Benefits Under Their Auto Policy Capital Gold Group, Inc. v. Nortier: An Out Of State Corporation Could Change Its Place Of Incorporation And Still Maintain A Lawsuit In California Gilman v. Dalby: An Attorney’s Fee Lien Has Precedence Over A Medical Lien Hernandez v. Hillsides, Inc.: A “Secret” Surveillance Camera May Not Invade Employee Privacy Rights If It Serves A Legitimate Purpose Hinton v. Beck: A Non-Defending Insurer Is Not Entitled To Intervene Meza v. H. Muehlstein & Co.: Communications Between Attorneys For Different Parties May Be Protected By Common Interest Doctrine Sanchez v. County of San Bernardino: Disclosure Of Information That Was Subject To A Confidential Settlement Agreement Supported An Action For Breach Of Contract Standard Pacific Corporation v. Superior Court: The “Fix-It” Law Applies To A Construction Defect Case Unless The Homeowner Shows The Builder Did Not Comply With Its Requirement Williams v. Southern California Gas Company: Discovery Responses In An Earlier Case Did Not Preclude A Second One Wood v. Santa Monica Escrow Company: A Party Who Prevails On Appeal Is Not Necessarily The Prevailing Party In The Action When It Comes To An Award Of Attorney Fees Back
	© 2012 Berger Kahn, A Law Corporation    Disclaimer